A video demonstration shows two impartial AI language systems debating and reaching consensus rapidly, implying that blockchain-secured AI may effectively substitute human politicians to improve governance and lower operational costs.
i think blockchain-ai might speed up decision making, but it lacks human touch and ethical feel. errors in code or bias in data could turn bad fast. maybe a combo of tech and people is better.
hey, i was just tinkering on this idea too and its kinda interesting to think if these chain-of-thought models could really replace the messy human element in politcal decision making. what if the human factor is what makes policies sometimes adaptable in unexpected crises? i mean, theres this concept where a blend between unbiased algorithm and human warm judgement could work more smoothly. how do u guys think we could ever program empathy or classic gut feel into a code? also, any thoughts on how we’d cope with getting software errors or unpredictable exploits in this scenario? looking forward to hearing some wild and thoughtful ideas on this!
After working on blockchain integrations in civic tech projects, I remain skeptical about completely replacing politicians with blockchain-powered AI. Although the debate and consensus processes can be streamlined, real-world policy-making involves more than rapid data processing; it demands human insight, ethical flexibility, and understanding of local nuances that pure algorithms struggle to replicate. In my own experience, projects that tried to fully automate decision-making encountered significant challenges when unexpected social factors came into play. It is essential to maintain a balance between technological efficiency and human judgment.