During a podcast discussion, Sidemen member Vikstar shared how the group was approached with an NFT proposal, mentioning that KSI appeared to think it was an excellent idea. However, Vikstar strongly opposed the suggestion, emphasizing his disagreement. As a result, the video clip that captured this conversation is reportedly being taken down from various online platforms because it negatively affects KSI’s image.
The removal of that video raises important questions about transparency and narrative control online. From my perspective, discussions that cast public figures in a particular light can quickly become complicated when selective content is used. The claim that the video negatively affected KSI’s image may reflect broader industry practices that favor image management over full disclosure. Personal observations suggest that such measures can restrict a more balanced conversation about controversial topics, and they underscore the need for careful evaluation of sources and context when interpreting these decisions.
i reckon the removal smaks of overcontrol. its like theyre cherry-picking what story gets told. seems less about protecting ksi and more about flipping public opinion, ya know?
hey everyone, i kinda keep thinking about this whole removal thing… there seems to be a line between protecting someone’s image and actually hiding real conversations. im wondering if this removal is more about controlling the narrative than really protecting kis? i mean, if we drop these videos, are we really keeping it real or just censoring stuff for the sake of reputation? what do you think, is this a case of responsible moderation or are we letting too much control slip into these platforms? curious to hear yore thoughts on this topic.
The situation appears to be another instance where content curation by platforms might be prioritizing reputation management over open discussion. Based on my experiences following digital controversies, there is often a delicate balance between preventing misinformation and restricting genuine dialogue. Removing content that communicates controversial opinions, even if incomplete, can diminish public trust and obscure an accurate portrayal of events. Such actions can be seen as a way to control narratives surrounding public figures rather than a straightforward approach to address potential inaccuracies.